Skip to main content

EYEWEAR'S BRITISH POETRY POWER LIST 2013

Eyewear blog today surveys the world of British poetry, and compile a list of the twenty (20) most "powerful" individuals in "British poetry".  Both terms are obviously contentious, and no apology can be made for not parsing them endlessly here.  Critical work requires some jargon.  Anyway, we know what British poetry is, mainly - it is poetry published in Britain, or written by British poets, or both, or how those two sets overlap.  This list notes those figures who most potently shape what contemporary British poetry is - materially, ideologically, editorially, critically, and literally (in the act of creating it).  Notably, there are few academics or critics-only on this list, because British poetry has few extremely well-known and powerful poetry critics or scholars able to shape the canon, or cultural reception of poetry in these isles.  We have no Helen Vendler or Marjorie Perloff, to be exact.

We have no Harold Bloom.  A. Alvarez no longer weighs in, and few others have his former heft.  Those on this list come closest to that sort of power to decide what poems, poets, poetry books, and poetics, will be published, read, well-reviewed, taught, and prized.  And, it must be noted, we need to problematise the idea of agency here, because even these figures, vital as they are, and sometimes controversial, are hardly omnipotent.  Nor do they comprise some sort of "establishment" - there is not one British poetry establishment, anyway, but three or four, which overlap. Nor are these figures necessarily to be celebrated, per se: this isn't a list that says this is good, or right - just, this is as it is.


There may be a few names left off this list, and I have left several respected friends and colleagues off, who are very influential, important and should be more influential, but no argument can be easily made to remove any that are here - there is a brute facticity to these choices.  These are names to conjure with, and they are, for the most part, famous names.  They are mostly the names of professors, laureates, editors, and award-winners. The British (or English, at any rate) are often discomfited by the idea of anything as inelegant as use of power - but cultural power is the only power that poets are likely ever to have or exercise, and to deny it exists leads to a state of dis-empowerment for many.  The hope is, by creating such a list, power can be explored and utilised for the maximum cultural good, in future.


I have not listed those with the economic power to fund or defund, however. No one here is a bean counter or politician.

The list is in alphabetical order.

SIMON ARMITAGE

NEIL ASTLEY
ANDREA BRADY
CAROL ANN DUFFY
GEOFFREY HILL
MATTHEW HOLLIS
SIMON JARVIS
RODDY LUMSDEN
GLYN MAXWELL
ANDREW MOTION
SEAN O'BRIEN
DON PATERSON
JH PRYNNE
CRAIG RAINE
MAURICE RIORDAN
ROBIN ROBERTSON
FIONA SAMPSON
MICHAEL SCHMIDT
KESTON SUTHERLAND
AHREN WARNER

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

AMERICA PSYCHO

According to the latest CBS, ABC, etc, polls, Clinton is still likely to beat Trump - by percentile odds of 66% to 33% and change. But the current popular vote is much closer, probably tied with the error of margin, around 44% each. Trump has to win more key battleground states to win, and may not - but he is ahead in Florida...

We will all know, in a week, whether we live in a world gone madder, or just relatively mad.

While it seems likely calmer heads will prevail, the recent Brexit win shows that polls can mislead, especially when one of the options is considered a bit embarrassing, rude or even racist - and Trump qualifies for these, at least.

If 42-45% of Americans admit they would vote for Trump, what does that say about the ones not so vocal? For surely, they must be there, as well. Some of the undecided will slide, and more likely they will slide to the wilder and more exciting fringe candidate. As may the libertarians.

Eyewear predicts that Trump will just about manage to win th…

DANGER, MAN

Like a crazed killer clown, whether we are thrilled, horrified, shocked, or angered (or all of these) by Donald Trump, we cannot claim to be rid of him just yet. He bestrides the world stage like a silverback gorilla (according to one British thug), or a bad analogy, but he is there, a figure, no longer of fun, but grave concern.

There has long been a history of misogynistic behaviour in American gangster culture - one thinks of the grapefruit in the face in The Public Enemy, or Sinatra throwing a woman out of his hotel room and later commenting he didn't realise there was a pool below to break her fall, or the polluted womb in Pacino'sScarface... and of course, some gangsta rap is also sexist.  American culture has a difficult way with handling the combined aspects of male power, and male privilege, that, especially in heteronormative capitalist enclaves, where money/pussy both become grabbable, reified objects and objectives (The Wolf of Wall Street for instance), an ugly fus…

OSCAR SMOSHCAR

The Oscars - Academy Awards officially - were once huge cultural events - in 1975, Frank Sinatra, Sammy Davis Jr, Shirley MacLaineandBob Hope co-hosted, for example - and Best Picture noms included The Conversation and Chinatown. Godfather Part 2 won. Last two years, movies titled Birdman and Spotlight won, and the hosts and those films are retrospectively minor, trifling. This year, some important, resonant films are up for consideration - including Hidden Figures and Moonlight, two favourites of this blog. Viola Davis and Denzel Washington will hopefully win for their sterling performances in Fences. However, La La Land - the most superficial and empty Best Picture contender since Gigi in 1959 (which beat Vertigo) - could smite all comers, and render this year's awards historically trivial, even idiotic.

The Oscars often opt for safe, optimistic films, or safe, pessimistic films, that are usually about white men (less often, white women) finding their path to doing the right thin…