Skip to main content

CFS: The Poet's Quest for God, reminder

Call for Submissions
The Poet's Quest for God: 21st Century Poems of Spirituality
Edited by Dr.Oliver V. Brennan and Dr. Todd Swift
For Publication by Eyewear Publishing 2013
Deadline for submission: August 1, 2012

Eyewear Publishing is publishing an anthology of new, previously unpublished or recently published, poems, written in English, concerned with spiritual issues in this secular age, by persons of any faith, or none. Submissions will be welcomed via email as word documents, containing no more than three poems, and including contact details and a brief 100 word biographical note about the author.

One of the characteristics of our contemporary culture which is generally
described as post-modern is the human search for the spiritual. The advent
of post-modernity has been accompanied by the dawn of a new spiritual
awakening. Many spiritual writers say that desire is our fundamental
dis-ease and is always stronger than satisfaction. This desire lies at the
centre of our lives, in the deep recesses of the soul. This unquenchable
fire residing in all of us manifests itself at key points in the human life
cycle. Spirituality is ultimately what we do about that desire. When Plato
said that we are on fire because our souls come from beyond and that beyond
is trying to draw it back to itself, he is laying out the broad outlines for
a spirituality. Augustine made this explicitly Christian in his universally
known phrase: 'You have made us for yourself, O Lord, and our hearts are
restless until they rest in You'.
This new emphasis on and openness to the spiritual dimension of human
existence which is characteristic of contemporary lived culture is
accompanied by a new emergence of atheism - 'The Rage against God' - as well
as a sometimes-aggressive secularism. Richard Dawkins and Christopher
Hitchens are the two best-known exemplars of this in Western Europe.
Perhaps the best response to this rage against belief in a Divine Power at
work in the universe is a poetic one. In reply to people such as his
brother Christopher and Dawkins, Peter Hitchens believes that passions as
strong as theirs are more likely to be countered by 'the unexpected force of
poetry, which can ambush the human heart at any time'.
Hence we invite poets from around the world who can empathise with the new
search for the spiritual to write about their belief, search or struggle
with their quest for God (or a God), whether their image of God is what one
young person described as 'a creative energy that exists all around us, a
life force', the female image of God of the Old Testament, or the Abba
(Father) image which lay at the core of the spirituality of Jesus of
Nazareth, or indeed, some heretofore unimagined apprehension of the divine.
The purpose of this collection is to awaken debate, create an imaginative
discourse and generally open a space for religious poetic practices in the
contemporary world, while at the same time refusing to delimit the horizon
of the possible.
As poetry, and poets, have a long, rich, and no doubt complicated tradition
of writing to, and about God (one needs only to think of Dante, Milton,
Donne and Dickinson) and other issues surrounding faith, belief, and
transcendence, the editors believe there should be no shortage of inspiring,
inquiring, intriguing and imaginative poems available for readers at this
challenging time in human history.

For more information, or to submit, contact Dr Swift at or at Facebook
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog


According to the latest CBS, ABC, etc, polls, Clinton is still likely to beat Trump - by percentile odds of 66% to 33% and change. But the current popular vote is much closer, probably tied with the error of margin, around 44% each. Trump has to win more key battleground states to win, and may not - but he is ahead in Florida...

We will all know, in a week, whether we live in a world gone madder, or just relatively mad.

While it seems likely calmer heads will prevail, the recent Brexit win shows that polls can mislead, especially when one of the options is considered a bit embarrassing, rude or even racist - and Trump qualifies for these, at least.

If 42-45% of Americans admit they would vote for Trump, what does that say about the ones not so vocal? For surely, they must be there, as well. Some of the undecided will slide, and more likely they will slide to the wilder and more exciting fringe candidate. As may the libertarians.

Eyewear predicts that Trump will just about manage to win th…


Like a crazed killer clown, whether we are thrilled, horrified, shocked, or angered (or all of these) by Donald Trump, we cannot claim to be rid of him just yet. He bestrides the world stage like a silverback gorilla (according to one British thug), or a bad analogy, but he is there, a figure, no longer of fun, but grave concern.

There has long been a history of misogynistic behaviour in American gangster culture - one thinks of the grapefruit in the face in The Public Enemy, or Sinatra throwing a woman out of his hotel room and later commenting he didn't realise there was a pool below to break her fall, or the polluted womb in Pacino'sScarface... and of course, some gangsta rap is also sexist.  American culture has a difficult way with handling the combined aspects of male power, and male privilege, that, especially in heteronormative capitalist enclaves, where money/pussy both become grabbable, reified objects and objectives (The Wolf of Wall Street for instance), an ugly fus…


The Oscars - Academy Awards officially - were once huge cultural events - in 1975, Frank Sinatra, Sammy Davis Jr, Shirley MacLaineandBob Hope co-hosted, for example - and Best Picture noms included The Conversation and Chinatown. Godfather Part 2 won. Last two years, movies titled Birdman and Spotlight won, and the hosts and those films are retrospectively minor, trifling. This year, some important, resonant films are up for consideration - including Hidden Figures and Moonlight, two favourites of this blog. Viola Davis and Denzel Washington will hopefully win for their sterling performances in Fences. However, La La Land - the most superficial and empty Best Picture contender since Gigi in 1959 (which beat Vertigo) - could smite all comers, and render this year's awards historically trivial, even idiotic.

The Oscars often opt for safe, optimistic films, or safe, pessimistic films, that are usually about white men (less often, white women) finding their path to doing the right thin…