Skip to main content

Tetro

Tetro, by Francis Ford Coppola, his latest film, now out on DVD, is a sort of cinematic folly - a late-style work by an old man who can't possibly replicate his great early works: The Godfather, The Conversation, and Apocalypse Now, three of the greatest American films.  Coppola has made other stylish masterworks, too: The Godfather II, Rumblefish, and Dracula.  Tetro, shot in Buenos Aires, has elements of all his major films, and is in fact a not-subtle commentary on the life of fame ("don't look into the lights") and the absurdity of critical and commercial success.  Indeed, it's main Tragic core - how a family dominated by a cruel egomaniacal patriarch is sapped of life - clearly echoes The Godfather saga; but family issues - especially between brothers - have long been of interest to Coppola; as has been the absent, yet powerful father-figure who may be God (see "the Director" in The Conversation).

Most notably, Tetro's black and white scenes recall the beauty of Rumblefish and The Outsiders; while the rotten-fruit colour sequences bring to mind late Welles.  In fact, the references to The Magnificent Ambersons and Citizen Kane are many: from shadow play, to mirrors, to camp musical productions, to the shattered life-narrative being pieced together in a mirror. However, the strongest influence is the work of Powell and Pressburger, especially The Red Shoes - another film about a powerful dominating theatrical presence, and the life-expunging demands of Art.

Tetro fails elegantly - though directed, acted, and edited brilliantly - it lacks the urgency or imaginative interest that Kane has - there is no internal urgency, and the title character's reluctance to accept his destiny and gifts is more annoying than enigmatic - why should we believe the man has genius when he mostly resembles yet another shuffling chain-smoking wannabe writer with gaunt face and unwashed hair?  The film has a forced image of light and moths that borders on cliche, and the over-use of the trope of vehicular accidents and ambulances seems forced and trite - what is the objective correlative of a traffic accident?

However, while at turns languid, then overly-theatrical (some of the cabaret scenes are preposterously art-house), the movie impresses for being utterly alien to the demands of the current American scene - set in a remote land, and exploring issues of creativity and belonging that are more thoughtful and lyrical than one might expect from an American film.  Feeling very European, by way of South America's magic realism, this is actually a fine achievement, and if a younger woman or man had made it, it would have been seen as promising much.  As it is, it is a winding down of a mighty career.  I hope to see another few films from this master before his reel is done.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CLIVE WILMER'S THOM GUNN SELECTED POEMS IS A MUST-READ

THAT HANDSOME MAN  A PERSONAL BRIEF REVIEW BY TODD SWIFT I could lie and claim Larkin, Yeats , or Dylan Thomas most excited me as a young poet, or even Pound or FT Prince - but the truth be told, it was Thom Gunn I first and most loved when I was young. Precisely, I fell in love with his first two collections, written under a formalist, Elizabethan ( Fulke Greville mainly), Yvor Winters triad of influences - uniquely fused with an interest in homerotica, pop culture ( Brando, Elvis , motorcycles). His best poem 'On The Move' is oddly presented here without the quote that began it usually - Man, you gotta go - which I loved. Gunn was - and remains - so thrilling, to me at least, because so odd. His elegance, poise, and intelligence is all about display, about surface - but the surface of a panther, who ripples with strength beneath the skin. With Gunn, you dressed to have sex. Or so I thought.  Because I was queer (I maintain the right to lay claim to that

IQ AND THE POETS - ARE YOU SMART?

When you open your mouth to speak, are you smart?  A funny question from a great song, but also, a good one, when it comes to poets, and poetry. We tend to have a very ambiguous view of intelligence in poetry, one that I'd say is dysfunctional.  Basically, it goes like this: once you are safely dead, it no longer matters how smart you were.  For instance, Auden was smarter than Yeats , but most would still say Yeats is the finer poet; Eliot is clearly highly intelligent, but how much of Larkin 's work required a high IQ?  Meanwhile, poets while alive tend to be celebrated if they are deemed intelligent: Anne Carson, Geoffrey Hill , and Jorie Graham , are all, clearly, very intelligent people, aside from their work as poets.  But who reads Marianne Moore now, or Robert Lowell , smart poets? Or, Pound ?  How smart could Pound be with his madcap views? Less intelligent poets are often more popular.  John Betjeman was not a very smart poet, per se.  What do I mean by smart?

"I have crossed oceans of time to find you..."

In terms of great films about, and of, love, we have Vertigo, In The Mood for Love , and Casablanca , Doctor Zhivago , An Officer and a Gentleman , at the apex; as well as odder, more troubling versions, such as Sophie's Choice and  Silence of the Lambs .  I think my favourite remains Bram Stoker's Dracula , with the great immortal line "I have crossed oceans of time to find you...".