Skip to main content

Weird Scenes Inside the Goldmine

Eyewear congratulates Professor Don Paterson, Scotland's leading male poet, on his youthful win of the Queen's Gold Medal for Poetry. He must be one of the youngest winners - it's an honour often reserved for elder poets.

The poet put forward must have the laureate's blessing, and Scotland's leading female poet, Carol Ann Duffy, clearly felt an affinity. Besides the Scottish, Picador and generational links, Duffy and Paterson were key mainstream poets of the 90s and 00s who saw off the threat of Heaney and Muldoon and created a new populist vernacular style.

Paterson, who doesn't - judging by his editorial and critical writings - much like the poetry of Dylan Thomas, Prynne, or amateur and anti-war poets, is as admired in the UK as he is controversial. Is he the new king of the cats or prince in waiting? Surely, his North American reputation is set to grow. I predict he will win the Nobel Prize for literature before 2020.

Comments

Jeffrey Side said…
Bizarre! Obviously Carol pulled a few strings for him.
Anonymous said…
Carol Ann Duffy CBE OBE, decides Don Patterson OBE, is worthiest winner of the Queen's Gold Medal.

Hmm, is it me being thick, or is it a fact that these two highness loving luvvies know their place in the grander scheme, and are being a useful and tiny cog on Her Majesty's behalf?

Would a non-highness loving working-class radical who chose not to endorse the Crown, ever be rewarded with all the gongs by their peers in the way the author of God's Gift To Women, is?

He doesn't like 'amatuer' poets and is dead dead serious about his own stuff that his pals with OBE's wax orgasmically over. And it is interesting to note, poets like Sir Andrew, will be remembered long after they are acting no more in the realm of light and life, hey?

Happy new year.

Swords, Earl of Desmond
Anonymous said…
I don't think it's bizarre at all. He's spent years sucking up to the establishment.
Jeffrey Side said…
I meant the concept of the award is bizarre.
leah fritz said…
As poets we have to look away from all this pomp. It's nice that Carol Ann Duffy is willing to play that role, and I wish her happiness and good work for the next decade. I'm not familiar with the poems of Don Paterson or his opinions. Perhaps one day I'll get around to reading them, but right now I have too many fine poets to contemplate. The one who has this blog, for instance. And somebody just put me on to Wallace Stevens. And then there's my own stuff. The world is in one fine mess. Who cares about the politics of the poetry scene?
Anonymous said…
Rain is a bit thin (watery, wet, etc). Though I'd like to reserve judgement until I've read it again. Nil Nil was great, and there was good stuff later. The honour is pish and air, a fair fit for verse, perhaps.

But good to see you posting Todd, and I hope the new year treats you kindly.

Popular posts from this blog

CLIVE WILMER'S THOM GUNN SELECTED POEMS IS A MUST-READ

THAT HANDSOME MAN  A PERSONAL BRIEF REVIEW BY TODD SWIFT I could lie and claim Larkin, Yeats , or Dylan Thomas most excited me as a young poet, or even Pound or FT Prince - but the truth be told, it was Thom Gunn I first and most loved when I was young. Precisely, I fell in love with his first two collections, written under a formalist, Elizabethan ( Fulke Greville mainly), Yvor Winters triad of influences - uniquely fused with an interest in homerotica, pop culture ( Brando, Elvis , motorcycles). His best poem 'On The Move' is oddly presented here without the quote that began it usually - Man, you gotta go - which I loved. Gunn was - and remains - so thrilling, to me at least, because so odd. His elegance, poise, and intelligence is all about display, about surface - but the surface of a panther, who ripples with strength beneath the skin. With Gunn, you dressed to have sex. Or so I thought.  Because I was queer (I maintain the right to lay claim to that

IQ AND THE POETS - ARE YOU SMART?

When you open your mouth to speak, are you smart?  A funny question from a great song, but also, a good one, when it comes to poets, and poetry. We tend to have a very ambiguous view of intelligence in poetry, one that I'd say is dysfunctional.  Basically, it goes like this: once you are safely dead, it no longer matters how smart you were.  For instance, Auden was smarter than Yeats , but most would still say Yeats is the finer poet; Eliot is clearly highly intelligent, but how much of Larkin 's work required a high IQ?  Meanwhile, poets while alive tend to be celebrated if they are deemed intelligent: Anne Carson, Geoffrey Hill , and Jorie Graham , are all, clearly, very intelligent people, aside from their work as poets.  But who reads Marianne Moore now, or Robert Lowell , smart poets? Or, Pound ?  How smart could Pound be with his madcap views? Less intelligent poets are often more popular.  John Betjeman was not a very smart poet, per se.  What do I mean by smart?

"I have crossed oceans of time to find you..."

In terms of great films about, and of, love, we have Vertigo, In The Mood for Love , and Casablanca , Doctor Zhivago , An Officer and a Gentleman , at the apex; as well as odder, more troubling versions, such as Sophie's Choice and  Silence of the Lambs .  I think my favourite remains Bram Stoker's Dracula , with the great immortal line "I have crossed oceans of time to find you...".